Commentaries on Love

Elizabeth Bevarly made this comment on the now defunct blog called Squawk Radio. I have to wonder if it is because there is a prevailing sensibility that Bevarly simply articulated.

"Heroines are often portrayed in isolation, no friends, often estranged from family or an orphan, teetering on the brink of financial ruin. They are depicted as sad sack individuals whose sexual identity was created for them out of one miserable experience with a man more interested in the growth of his own toenails than the satisfaction of his partner in bed. The whole driving motivation for the female is to achieve a better sense of completion through the love of a good man."

So there is our red magic ?

She even says that “being loved in return is a big part of what makes us complete.”

Sybylla in "My brilliant career" says,
“Loneliness is a terrible price to pay for independence.”
Jane in her blog "Dear Author " questions a view as :

"Where did this come from, this idea that in order to be complete, we women had to be alone? That by falling in love and making a commitment to another human being, we were somehow diminishing ourselves? That our choices were: A) Fall in love and be unhappy, or B) Remain alone and be happy. Why couldn’t we fall in love and be happy? Nope, sorry. Not one of the choices, according to the world where I grew up."

Does that mean like love makes it unhappy?

It's interesting that, as with William Sheldon's theory concerning somatotypes, different body types are being correlated with particular personalities. Sheldon's classification system was as follows:

Endomorphic -- tendency to put on fat, soft roundness of body, short tapering limbs, small bones, velvety skin; viscerotonic temperament, relaxed, comfortable person, loves luxury, an extrovert.

Mesomorphic -- predominance of muscles, bone, and motor organs, large trunk, heavy chest, large wrist and hands, lean rectangular outline; somotonic or Dionysian temperament, active, assertive, aggressive, unrestrained.

Ectomorphic -- predominance of skin, lean, fragile, delicate body, small bones, droppy shoulders, small face, sharp nose, fine hair; cerebrotonic temperament, sensitive, distractible, insomnia, skin troubles, allergies.

Does dominance relates to this red magic in some way?

Laura Vivaco in her blog "teachmetonight"

wrote:

"What concerns me is that the ‘ideal’ world that some women want would have boys for men or at least those with teeny weenies, no chest hair, no muscles and itty itty schlongs that would never mess up or bother a delicate female HooHoo. And men who aren’t men, just beaten down creatures allowed to live in the presence of the Princesses."

Since her ideal world has women of such wants, does that mean those woman love such world or such men! Is that feeling called LOVE?

I've referred to these blogs or movies not because of a keen hobby but to put fort these questions.

So what exactly is 💓